• |
  • 極速報價
  • |
  • etnet專輯
    etnet專輯
  • 會員
  • 產品服務 / 串流版
  • 設定
過往專欄
心筆在妍
政是有心教材攻略。學得要精趣味投資法暢所欲妍HR唔易做辦公室政治論盡中港台時事要聞圖窮秘現中環人金錢世界呈分試 你要知小事大意義全城聚焦點政•漫料理NatFix我家私房菜素心Cook心理攻防戰綠路閑人好書看多點Pris形象教室形象UP!保哥快趣煮Green Monday看透生死親子語我要初創政策.正察跳躍中國時空筆記留心站財玄廣進點歷史看真點時勢造網紅Online有話兒DR-Max 一點就明Bella vita 美好生活iMoney 熱點Talk Of The Town活得健康點親子芬享不藥而癒人生燦爛點凱文隨筆尋寶島盛衰關鍵國金與投資留給囝囝IC理財打工秘笈樂活人生SME 解密「港」創業‧談管理心靈加油站「男」言之隱滾蛋吧,腫瘤花生味辦公室健康透視抗癌煮意知‧解醫學創業兵團匯對達人容我細說言歸政傳政經頑石不低頭為理發聲郎旋風薰香療法男士診症室抵玩自助遊句句有骨星座命理念力•氣功手機應用tips睛益求精嚴浩 LIKE!見微知著跟著陶冬找美食數碼潮人廣告有晴踏出退休第一步識食•惜食有種CEO叫做莊潮爆網事羅湖橋兩邊娛樂酷辣辣思歪思正十萬八千里樂本健‧教室特首選舉趣食60秒入廚101觀自然•觀香港有種生活政本清源心筆在妍維基解碼IT戰國誌煮酒論政今日趣聞馬壇.誌趣星期二周融愛瘋Apps美美道來大國崛起智醒日誌@中小企「營」刃而解Smart Buying甜品工房Education Calculator家事法庭升學信箱新手媽媽怪獸父母營營樂樂親子專題財富非常道謝國忠看勢獨唱團京城近觀原來如此乾坤挪移街坊食神Keyman森巴舞睇波LU文化導遊精神解碼抗癌兵團有營生活吾道崢廣見聞名家名畫商務英語型品薈我心中的米芝蓮歐洲直擊旅途中食得喜Leadership Coaching一哥教攝影心晴百態乳你同行專科專論人愛衣裝Word Discovery科技趨勢愛情故事投資達人政治擂台藝術投資秘笈抗癌點滴寵物情緣淘寶lization電影一線網絡鬼故主.管微博一分鐘管理娛樂有理進攻SAT古今名錶政‧經‧女人The Beauty Factor議會內外石油戰爭男女情色談金說匯風水環境學細味建築Green Hong Kong星光伴我行我吃過的米芝蓮A+孩子上海觀察京城札記鐵娘駕到食客三千創富新思維海外升學信箱Today's Web藝術投資世界在讀什麼-雷美華潮得起Business English飛越地球村紅酒情報職場物語股場琦手鑽石媒人Mei Ling好愛情‧壞愛情性治療師手記名牌女王嶺南人語醫美正當時黃金時代醫美正當時一份好工美麗不妥協上班纏下班逅

16/03/2015

永遠走在最前線

 

  這些日子我一直在反思,甚至開始覺得自己不懂新聞了,或者也該慶幸,我今天已不是記者。

 

  我不是唸新聞系的,所以沒有那些傳媒法、新聞道德、採訪守則之類的基礎訓練,一上陣已要上戰場。當年邊做邊學邊惡補,有前輩告訴我,那些理論是用來講的,不必墨守成規,做是另一回事。卻沒想過那「另一回事」,竟跟記者的抱負如此背道而馳。

 

  做得記者,或多或少有點正義感、抱打不平、查根究柢的心。然而,近日所見,記者似乎已成了社會上最冷酷的一群。永遠走在最前線,卻永遠表現出最事不關己,最近的反水貨事件便可見一斑。

 

  70歲老伯被推倒,如滾地葫蘆,間間傳媒都拍到,證明個個記者都在現場,卻無一人施以援手,大家只知道別漏掉畫面去交差。

 

  我想起幾個月前在立法會門口的衝擊事件,當一眾滋事者不斷用鐵欄撞向立法會的玻璃大門時,執法警察還未趕到,卻有一圈又一圈的記者圍著肇事者作現場直播。

 

  我一直疑惑,當記者目睹罪案發生,他應該做回一個人,還是繼續做冷眼旁觀的記者?看到老伯倒地,一個人的正常反應是伸手去扶,一個記者的直接反應是舉機去拍,還要取個痛苦大特寫。

 

  我想問,記者當日入這一行的初衷是否因為正義?是的話,為甚麼今日要跟在暴徒身邊,幫手以鏡頭作欺凌?報道與參與的界線愈來愈模糊了,記者與霸權的角色愈來愈混淆了,今時今日,還是那句,慶幸我已不再是記者。

 

轉載自: 晴報

 

 《經濟通》所刊的署名及/或不署名文章,相關內容屬作者個人意見,並不代表《經濟通》立場,《經濟通》所扮演的角色是提供一個自由言論平台。

etnet榮獲HKEX Awards 2024 「最佳證券數據供應商」大獎► 查看詳情

我要回應36

版主留言

我要回應

登入

發表回應

登記

成為新會員

回應只代表會員個人觀點,不代表經濟通立場

  • 只看作者回應
  • 查看全部回應
  • 順序
  • 倒序
  • ctang8發表於 2015-3-18 08:49 AM
  • #37
  • The writer does 3 things today:
    - recycle the topic of supporting police
    - use the pro-establishment reader's words (as I have suggested)
    - take the column out of etnet.

    She is out of topic, out of words, and lacking courage to take criticism.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 思無邪發表於 2015-3-17 11:57 PM
  • #36
  • 很久前我是蘋困的讀者﹐買此報只是為了支持「民主」這個虛妄的理念!
    但在它報導一位上水妓女被搶劫後赤身追賊、郤被賊捉住和警員對恃.......。
    最令我反感的你有必要把妓女赤身露體的樣子拿來頭版嗎?
    你怕香港人都記不住那位妓女的樣子?
    有沒有那張相會影響我的知情權嗎?
    香港很多的記者都是吃屎大的畜生。
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2015-3-17 08:17 AM
  • #35
  • 回覆 #34 nile


    Everything she said, says, will say - is spearheaded to attack groups of people she does not like - pro- democrats predominantly. See if I am right today.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • nile發表於 2015-3-17 04:19 AM
  • #34
  • I have the feeling that this columnist always wants to see things under a microscope and magnify them to cover the whole sky/universe in order to gain popularity among the many idiotic readers at this forum. What's a big deal that a seventy-year-old falls to the ground? There won't be any news if the job of the reporter is to prevent them from happening, then this columnist wouldn't have the material to fill up the daily column which the columnist is struggling to submit.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2015-3-16 11:25 PM
  • #33
  • 回覆 #32 Freemanchina


    Total censorship means everything is screened in Internet. This is a fact.
    Whatever you can see is known and permitted by China authority.
    Disallowed matters will be deleted instantly once discovered.

    As propagandist, you certainly know it well.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Freemanchina發表於 2015-3-16 09:54 PM
  • #32
  • You American guy are blackening my country (China) again!

    There hasn't ever any of your so-called "total censorship" on internet.

    I found myself free to gain access to any lawful webs while I was in China.

    Of course, if you want to visit any porno or illegal webs in China, there would be filtered!

    This is for the goodness sake of the society.

    For me, it is absolutely okay! because unlike you probably, visiting porno webs are not my interest.

  • 引用 #30 ctang8 發表於 2015-3-16 03:09 PM

    Premier Li gives the full support of electronic commerce. I wonder when the total censorship on int ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • nile發表於 2015-3-16 03:14 PM
  • #31
  • You like my "beautiful" English, my dear?

  • 引用 #26 king 發表於 2015-3-16 02:28 PM

    你這隻老色鬼又開始廢男思春了.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2015-3-16 03:09 PM
  • #30
  • Premier Li gives the full support of electronic commerce. I wonder when the total censorship on internet will be lifted. Then, China will become a truely great nation which prepares to open up to the world.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2015-3-16 02:46 PM
  • #29
  • 回覆 #23 sunmobile


    Agree that HK must absolutely uphold the freedom of the press.

    HK freedom of press is under siege of political, economical, editorial, governmental pressure. I salute to those who still dare to speak and I despite those who turn into propaganda machine.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 靚姐發表於 2015-3-16 02:45 PM
  • #28
  • 這個例子是某些行業中人職業病上身泯滅了作為人的同理心!

  • 引用 #19 樓外人 發表於 2015-3-16 02:08 PM

    我講一個真人真事的故事,我強調是真人真事。 大約十多年前,有一青年與女友向朋友租用一樓宇居住,但他這 ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2015-3-16 02:38 PM
  • #27
  • 回覆 #19 樓外人


    I don't know how unnecessarily long or detailed portraying of the griefing mother. Say if that is not excessive, another way of looking at this - truely reported the emotions of the griefing mother can serve:

    - as accusation of how the police inadequately protects prisoners from suicide
    - as reflection of people should stand up against adversity rather just die without regarding the people who care for him.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • king發表於 2015-3-16 02:28 PM
  • #26
  • 你這隻老色鬼又開始廢男思春了.

  • 引用 #24 nile 發表於 2015-3-16 02:22 PM

    I hope you don't mind if I try to express some of my personal feelings in disguise of my replying ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • sunmobile發表於 2015-3-16 02:27 PM
  • #25
  • 香港的幾大成功基石:法治,新聞自由,言論自由正受到全面的攻擊。

    對這些攻擊香港人真的要清醒,破壞永遠比建設來得容易,當沒有民主政治體制的保障時,這些基石是很容易被滲透甚至推倒。
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • nile發表於 2015-3-16 02:22 PM
  • #24
  • I hope you don't mind if I try to express some of my personal feelings in disguise of my replying to your commentary:
    (1) if someone like this columnist who always thinks about her personal interests, becoming a reporter at Apple Daily, sent into Mainland China, reports on the prevailing social events, can you think how accurate her reporting could be?
    (2) if someone like this columnist who had been recruited by Baptist University, lacked the proper training of Journalism, tried to teach the many students who wanted to become world-class journalists, you guess how high (or low) is the success rate?
    I feel sorry for Apple Daily, the students of Baptist University, and last but not the least, this forum to have recruited her as one of the columnists.
    My "younger" sister, Jutice could have done a better job and benefited more people here in the citation of Chinese poetry.

  • 引用 #13 小女人 發表於 2015-3-16 12:41 PM

    回覆 靚姐 感情太豐富(包括正義感), 做很多行業都會好易黐咗! 還怎麼活? 但如果連做人的基本道德 ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • sunmobile發表於 2015-3-16 02:20 PM
  • #23
  • 回覆 #15 Freemanchina


    中國的記者大多(不是所有)是黨的代言人,宣傳機器的一部分,所以在政治打手心目中,香港記者很奇怪,爲什麽可以有這麽多自由報道一些不利政權的消息。肯定是別有用心啦!

    當一個國家的政權連新聞自由也不能,不敢容納時,政權的打手們對香港新聞從業員的攻擊一點也不奇怪。

    不奇怪,但可悲,也可恥!
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Freemanchina發表於 2015-3-16 02:14 PM
  • #22
  • What I can say about these so-called "reporters" is:

    "Extremely cold blood"!

    Why the ecological environment of HK's media is so pathological?

  • 引用 #19 樓外人 發表於 2015-3-16 02:08 PM

    我講一個真人真事的故事,我強調是真人真事。 大約十多年前,有一青年與女友向朋友租用一樓宇居住,但他這 ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2015-3-16 02:13 PM
  • #21
  • 回覆 #20 Freemanchina


    I trust Kevin Lau. I trust MingPao.

    I don't not believe in reporting in places of total censorship.

    Reporters has professional guidelines to obersve. If they don't, they shall be fired like your dear Miss Wut.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Freemanchina發表於 2015-3-16 02:09 PM
  • #20
  • Any evidence?

    The so-called "reporters" in HK are fond of fabricating news to "evilize" China & to "beautify" western countries.

    As I observed, many so-called "reporters" like to wear outer-garments or bags with British or American flags!

    What're their real identity?

    Most spies like to use the identity of "reporters" to hide up their real duties!

    Please watch the activities of many so-called "reporters" by your eyes, & analyze their real motives by your brain!

  • 引用 #16 ctang8 發表於 2015-3-16 01:58 PM

    Where is the writer's sense of righteousness about hk reporters being brutally attached by reporting ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 樓外人發表於 2015-3-16 02:08 PM
  • #19
  • 我講一個真人真事的故事,我強調是真人真事。

    大約十多年前,有一青年與女友向朋友租用一樓宇居住,但他這位業主朋友把毒品藏在租給他的樓宇中,而這一青年與他的女友並不知情。後來警方查獲,這青年因有正式租約簽就,責任難以推卸,百口莫辯。被告上法庭。而他的業主朋友則逃之夭夭。

    上面是引子,引述事件的始由。此案件當年電視報紙都有報導。下面才是我要說的應對辯題的主要部份。

    話說結案聽判當日,該青年心感一生清白盡毀,還要面對最少十二年牢獄,一時心灰竟在高等法院十二樓的窗口一躍而下,倒於高等法院大門口對上的平台上。這名青年的母親當日也到庭,聞訊在高院門口放聲大哭。這時一個某電視台的記者,抬著攝影機對著這位正在嚎哭的母親的面部,距離大慨四到五吋,時間長達三四分鐘之久,最後被這位青年的兄長喝打還未肯收手。

    事件的上部份是事後從各媒體得知,而下半部份則是我本人親眼目睹。

    我的感慨是那名記者有須要把鏡頭伸的那麼近嗎?有須要連拍一個面部表情那麼久嗎?他到底是攞景還是贈興?

    我一再強調我與故事中人非親非故,並不認識。至於那名記者是對或錯,各自判斷。
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 靚姐發表於 2015-3-16 02:02 PM
  • #18
  • 是的。 理智與感情要平衡的, 否則無法堅持有意義的工作。
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 只看作者回應
  • 查看全部回應
  • 順序
  • 倒序
最緊要健康
  • 生活
  • DIVA
  • 健康好人生
專業版
HV2
精裝版
SV2
串流版
IQ 登入
強化版
TQ
強化版
MQ