• |
  • 極速報價
  • |
  • etnet專輯
    etnet專輯
  • 會員
  • 產品服務 / 串流版
  • 設定
過往專欄
心筆在妍
教材攻略。學得要精趣味投資法暢所欲妍HR唔易做辦公室政治論盡中港台時事要聞圖窮秘現中環人金錢世界呈分試 你要知小事大意義全城聚焦點政•漫料理NatFix我家私房菜素心Cook心理攻防戰綠路閑人好書看多點Pris形象教室形象UP!保哥快趣煮Green Monday看透生死親子語我要初創政策.正察跳躍中國時空筆記留心站財玄廣進點歷史看真點時勢造網紅Online有話兒DR-Max 一點就明Bella vita 美好生活iMoney 熱點Talk Of The Town活得健康點親子芬享不藥而癒人生燦爛點凱文隨筆尋寶島盛衰關鍵國金與投資留給囝囝IC理財打工秘笈樂活人生SME 解密「港」創業‧談管理心靈加油站「男」言之隱滾蛋吧,腫瘤花生味辦公室健康透視抗癌煮意知‧解醫學創業兵團匯對達人容我細說言歸政傳政經頑石不低頭為理發聲郎旋風薰香療法男士診症室抵玩自助遊句句有骨星座命理念力•氣功手機應用tips睛益求精嚴浩 LIKE!見微知著跟著陶冬找美食數碼潮人廣告有晴踏出退休第一步識食•惜食有種CEO叫做莊潮爆網事羅湖橋兩邊娛樂酷辣辣思歪思正十萬八千里樂本健‧教室特首選舉趣食60秒入廚101觀自然•觀香港有種生活政本清源心筆在妍維基解碼IT戰國誌煮酒論政今日趣聞馬壇.誌趣星期二周融愛瘋Apps美美道來大國崛起智醒日誌@中小企「營」刃而解Smart Buying甜品工房Education Calculator家事法庭升學信箱新手媽媽怪獸父母營營樂樂親子專題財富非常道謝國忠看勢獨唱團京城近觀原來如此乾坤挪移街坊食神Keyman森巴舞睇波LU文化導遊精神解碼抗癌兵團有營生活吾道崢廣見聞名家名畫商務英語型品薈我心中的米芝蓮歐洲直擊旅途中食得喜Leadership Coaching一哥教攝影心晴百態乳你同行專科專論人愛衣裝Word Discovery科技趨勢愛情故事投資達人政治擂台藝術投資秘笈抗癌點滴寵物情緣淘寶lization電影一線網絡鬼故主.管微博一分鐘管理娛樂有理進攻SAT古今名錶政‧經‧女人The Beauty Factor議會內外石油戰爭男女情色談金說匯風水環境學細味建築Green Hong Kong星光伴我行我吃過的米芝蓮A+孩子上海觀察京城札記鐵娘駕到食客三千創富新思維海外升學信箱Today's Web藝術投資世界在讀什麼-雷美華潮得起Business English飛越地球村紅酒情報職場物語股場琦手鑽石媒人Mei Ling好愛情‧壞愛情性治療師手記名牌女王嶺南人語醫美正當時黃金時代醫美正當時一份好工美麗不妥協上班纏下班逅

28/12/2015

公主病不再

  有孩子的父母應該明白,小朋友看電影的模式跟大人有點不一樣,最大的差異,就是重看。一齣喜愛的戲,他們可以看十次、廿次、甚至一百次,天天看都不覺悶。我家就有幾齣這樣的經典,孩子連對白都唸得出。宮崎駿的《千與千尋》是其一,迪士尼的《獅子王》是其二。

 

  上年宮崎駿的動畫手稿在香港沙田文化博物館展出,我家三個女兒已去了朝聖;今年迪士尼經典動畫藝術作品在青衣城、德福廣場及Popcorn展出,孩子當然不會錯過。

 

  這幾年紅到發紫的《魔雪奇緣》也是展品之一,我覺得迪士尼動畫發展到這一套帶出了新突破,就是女權主義。過去的公主系列雖然以女角為主,但最終要找個王子作幸福的歸宿,似乎是千篇一律的框框。公主戲之中最「硬淨」的要算是《花木蘭》,不過她最後卸下戎裝,還是要嫁給大將軍,逃不出王子公主快快樂樂生活下去的命運。

 

  《魔雪奇緣》有點不一樣,這齣戲說的是姐妹情,沒有男主角,只得男配角,思想比較新穎,暗喻女人沒有男人都一樣可以快樂活下去。不知是不是因為它的破格,所以得到前所未有的垂青,這幾年碰見的小女孩,幾乎沒有一個不愛Elsa & Anna的。

 

  所以,如果帶孩子去看藝術作品展的話,父母們不要只顧拍照,或者只顧著把孩子裝扮成公主,動畫故事其實滿載正面信息:友誼、家庭、勇氣、愛,還有打死不離親姐妹……父母讓孩子看動畫片的最終目的,不是要她們變成公主病,而是希望他/她們學懂愛。

 

轉載自: 晴報

 

 《經濟通》所刊的署名及/或不署名文章,相關內容屬作者個人意見,並不代表《經濟通》立場,《經濟通》所扮演的角色是提供一個自由言論平台。

《說說心理話》被欺凌 | 姜大衛兒子姜卓文分享年少經歷,長大如何走出無自信、隱藏自已的陰霾?► 即睇

我要回應25

版主留言

我要回應

登入

發表回應

登記

成為新會員

回應只代表會員個人觀點,不代表經濟通立場

  • 只看作者回應
  • 查看全部回應
  • 順序
  • 倒序
  • jutice發表於 2015-12-29 02:28 PM
  • #26
  • 咒人入墳墓是好心腸嗎?滿口叫人愛、愛、愛、愛、愛,愛你個頭!

  • 引用 #22 nile 發表於 2015-12-29 10:52 AM

    Etnet, you missed the point, the complaint is on IQ60, not grave (Please accept it with an open h ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 六十後男士發表於 2015-12-29 01:33 PM
  • #25
  • You must be viewing yourself in mirror.
    You're ugly.

  • 引用 #23 ctang8 發表於 2015-12-29 11:54 AM

    回覆 六十後男士 I don't have expectation on your gang either. I have seen the most ugly characte ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • nile發表於 2015-12-29 12:07 PM
  • #24
  • A rotten apple is still a rotten apple no matter how much make-up they put on their faces.

  • 引用 #23 ctang8 發表於 2015-12-29 11:54 AM

    回覆 六十後男士 I don't have expectation on your gang either. I have seen the most ugly characte ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2015-12-29 11:54 AM
  • #23
  • 回覆 #15 六十後男士


    I don't have expectation on your gang either. I have seen the most ugly characters here. May the new year brings a grain of honesty and decency to your folks.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • nile發表於 2015-12-29 10:52 AM
  • #22
  • Etnet, you missed the point, the complaint is on IQ60, not grave (Please accept it with an open heart).

  • 引用 #16 nile 發表於 2015-12-29 08:38 AM

    Bring love, not hatred (or jealousy) to your ****, IQ60.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • nile發表於 2015-12-29 10:40 AM
  • #21
  • Self-revelation, you finally touch the core of your problem, IQ60.

  • 引用 #20 六十後男士 發表於 2015-12-29 10:28 AM

    Full of selfish attempt. Very evil.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 六十後男士發表於 2015-12-29 10:28 AM
  • #20
  • Full of selfish attempt. Very evil.

  • 引用 #18 nile 發表於 2015-12-29 09:58 AM

    I see only amusement, no blood at all.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • jutice發表於 2015-12-29 10:07 AM
  • #19
  • Bring love, not hatred (or jealousy) to Etnet 吧,請你率先以身作則,因為行動比說話更有力量。

    哥林多前書:13:1
    「我若能說萬人的方言,並天使的話語,卻沒有愛,我就成了鳴的鑼、響的鈸一般」。

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~ 願以此共勉 ~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • 引用 #16 nile 發表於 2015-12-29 08:38 AM

    Bring love, not hatred (or jealousy) to your grave, IQ60.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • nile發表於 2015-12-29 09:58 AM
  • #18
  • I see only amusement, no blood at all.

  • 引用 #17 六十後男士 發表於 2015-12-29 09:33 AM

    It is you who did the first blood. What is the meaning of IQ60? Let me remind you guy again. Get ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 六十後男士發表於 2015-12-29 09:33 AM
  • #17
  • It is you who did the first blood.
    What is the meaning of IQ60?
    Let me remind you guy again.
    Get lost and let the web resume harmony.

  • 引用 #16 nile 發表於 2015-12-29 08:38 AM

    Bring love, not hatred (or jealousy) to your grave, IQ60.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • nile發表於 2015-12-29 08:38 AM
  • #16
  • Bring love, not hatred (or jealousy) to your ****, IQ60.

  • 引用 #15 六十後男士 發表於 2015-12-28 10:06 PM

    I have never had any expectation upon you and Nile. Hope you be ended together with 2015.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 六十後男士發表於 2015-12-28 10:06 PM
  • #15
  • I have never had any expectation upon you and Nile.
    Hope you be ended together with 2015.

  • 引用 #7 ctang8 發表於 2015-12-28 02:14 PM

    回覆 nile I don't wish for much - just no more hated speech from Wat.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 丁瑤發表於 2015-12-28 09:07 PM
  • #14
  • 公主病也是父母造成,媽媽平時在家中也是點爸爸做野,小朋友就會覺得咁係正常,但事實係唔一定所有男人都好似你爸一樣。
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • jutice發表於 2015-12-28 06:36 PM
  • #13
  • nile:謝謝你對J family如此週到。哥林多前書的真理,我也在學習中。

    既然你如此推崇基督的大愛,我們也希望從你身上引證「爱是不自夸。不张狂、不轻易发怒。不计算人的恶。不喜欢不义。只喜欢真理。」

    2015下半年,因一些瑣事,我們互相攻擊,回頭一望,不覺得很可笑嗎?希望你相信,我從沒有為你、c8、j2等建立粗口或A貨網名,而我也是受害者之一。新年將至,希望大家放下成見,互相尊重,作理性討論,以致上etnet也感到舒暢。

    昔日,我真的把你和c8看作家中兄長,因為你們時常為我打氣和解困。今天你願否把心扉重啟,讓我們再感受你的光和熱、信、望與愛?

  • 引用 #4 nile 發表於 2015-12-28 12:17 PM

    新约-- 哥林多前书(1 Corinthians) -- 第 13 章 13:4 爱是恒久忍耐,又有恩慈。爱是不嫉妒。爱是不自夸。不 ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • hongkonger發表於 2015-12-28 06:12 PM
  • #12
  • The day when the western media accepted "embedded journalism" is the Day of Judgement for press freedom, editorial independece etc.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • hongkonger發表於 2015-12-28 06:02 PM
  • #11
  • I am not an avid reader any more, I had read WSJ(European edition) since 1989 and stopped reading it around 1998, when HK govt fought off the blatant attack on our economy by the US-backed hedge funds. You should read the comments and their editorials at that time, it will open your eye, retrospectively, on how the world really works!
    My SUBJECTIVE criteria of any newspaper's so-called editorial independence ,be it is as famous as WSJ or as infamous as Apple Daily is very very simple and effective:-
    How they treat news of the Palestinian issue?
    If their reports just paint Palestinian as terrorists and nothing more, my instinct is that this is just a Jewish-controlled paper and the rest is history. The high ideals of so-called press freedom, democracy , editorial independence etc. are just nothing but blah, blah, blah...., dressed up to lead any gullible readers to their "objective reporting".

  • 引用 #9 John2 發表於 2015-12-28 04:20 PM

    hongkongers I think you misunderstood the true meaning of editorial independence and how WSJ reports ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 吡吡發表於 2015-12-28 04:32 PM
  • #10
  • 多女共事一夫,之所以源遠流長又行得通,Elsa & Anna的女性感情來路咪解釋咗囉!
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • John2發表於 2015-12-28 04:20 PM
  • #9
  • hongkongers
    I think you misunderstood the true meaning of editorial independence and how WSJ reports it.
    George Bush invaded Iraq based on faulty intelligence and claimed that Iraq has WMD. WSJ reported the claims of US Government as it is. If you read carefully the newspaper, WSJ reported the US Government claimed that there were evidences of WMD in Iraq. When US forces finally brought down Saddam, there were no WMD. WSJ then reported as there were no WMD found. Is this a reporting of facts as it is?

    You simply cannot interpret a faulty US intelligence or even US government misled mass media to hide the real motive of toppling Saddam as WSJ as not objective.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • John2發表於 2015-12-28 04:12 PM
  • #8
  • hongkonger 發表於 2015-12-26 10:52 PM

    2

    4
    #16
    WSJ objective? I thought WSJ stands for We Sell Jokes.
    The western media is objective? Just flashed back not so long ago to how their "embedded reporting" during the Second Iraq War and you will have your reporters "objective reports" on the invasion troops and cheering with George W Bush's "Mission Accompanished" speech on 1st May, 2003 aboard USS Abraham Lincoln; which turns out to be the biggest joke of the past decade.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ctang8發表於 2015-12-28 02:14 PM
  • #7
  • 回覆 #3 nile


    I don't wish for much - just no more hated speech from Wat.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 只看作者回應
  • 查看全部回應
  • 順序
  • 倒序
最緊要健康
  • 生活
  • DIVA
  • 健康好人生
專業版
HV2
精裝版
SV2
串流版
IQ 登入
強化版
TQ
強化版
MQ